Baby Ammal v. Thara

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 11.08.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R.HEMALATHA S.A.No. 933 of 2009 Baby Ammal ...Appellant/Plaintiff Vs.

1.Thara 2.Senthil Kumar 3.Prem Kumar 4.Dharmendran 5.Karthik 6.Narasimha Sengunthar 7.N.Kathirkama Prabhu 8.V.Jayalakshmi 9.Rajalakshmi 10.C.Rajasekar 11.C.Arun

...Respondents

Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure against the decree and judgment dated 11.07.2007 in A.S. No.294 of 2006, on the file of the II Additional City Civil Court, Chennai, confirming the decree and judgment dated 04.03.2004, in O.S. No.9720 of 1986, on the file of the VI Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai.

For Appellant : No appearance For R8 : Mr.Sriram

JUDGMENT

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the appellant.

2.It is represented by the learned counsel appearing for the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

eight respondent that the sole appellant died long back and till date no steps have been taken to implead the legal heirs of the deceased sole appellant.

3.In view of the above, the Second Appeal is dismissed as abated. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-IV) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar mtl To

1. The II Additional Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai

2. The VI Assistant Judge, City Civil Court, Chennai.

3. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras S.A.No. 933 of 2009 RSI(CO) RGA(27/08/2021) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/