The Director Fo School v. Punitha Arulappar Higher
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 2.1.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HULUVADI G.RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN W.A.No.1220 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014
1. The Director of School Education, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai 600 006.
2. The Joint Director of School Educational (Secondary) DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai 600 006.
3. District Educational Officer, Tenkasi 627 811, Tirunelveli District.
.. Appellants/Respondents
Versus
Punitha Arulappar Higher Secondary School, Avudayanoor 627 808 Tirunelveli District, rep. by its Correspondent Fr.V.K.S.Arulraj .. Respondent/Petitioner Prayer: Writ Appeal filed filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against the order dated 13.11.2013 passed in W.P.No.29538 of 2013 on the file of this court. W.P.No.29538 of 2013:- Writ of certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records relating to the proceedings of the 2nd respondent in Na.Ka.NO.009202/ T2/ F3/12 dated 13.7.2012 and to quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to approve the appointment of Thiru.A.Arul Jeyakodi to the post of Office Assistant in the petitioner School with effect from 2.9.2010 and to make payment of salary from the date of appointment with interest with all consequential and other attendant benefits within a time frame to be fixed by this Honourable court For appellants : Mr.P.S.Sivashanmugasundaram Special Government Pleader For respondent : G.Sankaran https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the court was made by HULUVADI G.RAMESH, J.) Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.
2. It appears that in various similar circumstances, the question of granting approval for the appointments of nonteaching staff by the aided school after the ban period is over, was considered and decided in favour of the institutions and therefore, the subject matter of the writ appeal is no longer res integra. Following such decisions, the learned Single Judge directed the appellants to consider granting of approval of the appointment made by the writ petitioner. However, the same was challenged by the State by filing the present writ appeal.
3. Now, it is brought to the notice of this court that pending the writ appeal, the order passed by the learned Single Judge is shown to have been complied with. In view of the same, this writ appeal is disposed of. No costs. The connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VI) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ssk To:
1. The Director of School Education, DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai 600 006.
2. The Joint Director of School Educational (Secondary), DPI Campus, College Road, Chennai 600 006.
3. District Educational Officer, Tenkasi 627 811, Tirunelveli District.
+1cc to G.Sankaran, Advocate, S.R.No.231 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.167 W.A.No.1220 of 2014 RV(CO) CS/08/02/18 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/