N. Vishnu Kumar v. The Superintendent Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 15.06.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.No.16765 of 2011 N.Vishnu Kumar

...Petitioner

Vs

1. The Superintendent of Police, Superintendent Office, Salem & District.

2. The Inspector of Police, Hasthampatti Police Station, Salem District.

...Respondents

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of declaration declaring that the impugned History Sheet No.178/08 on the file of the 2nd respondent as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Human Rights. For Petitioner : Mr.P.Vijendran For Respondents: Mr. Stalin Abhimanyu, Government Advocate

ORDER

Today, when this matter was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submitted that the relief sought for herein has become infructuous and hence, nothing survives for adjudication.

2. In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs.

s/d- Assistant Registrar(CS-VII) True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar rgr https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Superintendent Office, Salem & District.

2. The Inspector of Police, Hasthampatti Police Station, Salem District.

+1 CC to Mr.P.Vijendran, Advocate sr 28055 +1 CC to The Government Pleader sr 27954.

W.P.No.16765 of 2011 GPL(CO) SP(19/07/2021) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/