← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/11425/2015disposed of

A.Ramakrishnan v. The Superintendent Of Police

2015-06-09Honourable Mr Justice P. N. Prakash2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 09.06.2015 THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH CRL.O.P.No.11425 of 2015 A.Ramakrishnan .. Petitioner Vs.

State rep.by 1.

The Superintendent of Police, Tiruvannamalai District, Tiruvannamalai.

2.

The State rep. by Inspector of Police, Tiruvannamalai Town Police Station, (Law & Order) Tiruvannamalai, Tiruvannamalai District.

.. Respondents Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to direct the first respondent/Police to issue necessary direction to the second respondent to register the complaint given by the petitioner to the second respondent on 07.09.2014. For Petitioner :

Mr.K.Semmalai For Respondents :

Mr. C.Emalias Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

The petitioner seeks direction upon the first respondent to issue necessary direction to the second respondent to register the complaint given by him to the second respondent on 07.09.2014. 2.

Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent/Police.

3.

It is seen from the typed set of papers annexed along with this Petition that, initially, the petitioner had lodged his complaint, dated 07.09.2014, with the first respondent, and since the said complaint evoked no response, subsequently, he sent another complaint, dated 22.04.2015, containing same set of allegations, by post, addressed to the Superintendent of Police/first respondent. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4.

In view of the above, this Criminal Original Petition is closed with a direction to the petitioner to go in person and lodge his written complaint before the second respondent. As and when, such complaint is being lodged by the petitioner, the second respondent is directed to enquire into the matter and take further action in accordance with law, by registering a crime, if cognizable offence is made out, by following the dictum laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Lalita Kumari vs. Govt. of U.P. & others reported in [2013 (4) Crimes 243 (SC)].

sd -s/d- Assistant Registrar True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Tiruvannamalai District, Tiruvannamalai.

2. The State rep. by Inspector of Police, Tiruvannamalai Town Police Station, (Law & Order) Tiruvannamalai, Tiruvannamalai District.

3 The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai.

+ 1 cc to Mr.K.Semmalai, Advocate SR 27647 gj(co) prk25/6 CRL.O.P.No.11425 of 2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/