← Library
Madras High CourtWP/4283/2017closed

Chinnathambi v. The Tamil Nadu Goverment

2017-06-29Honourable Mr Justice R. Mahadevan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 29.06.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.No.4283 of 2017 Chinnathambi ..Petitioner Vs

1. The Tamil Nadu Government rep by its Commissioner and Secretary to Government Adi-Dravidar Welfare Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009

2. The District Collector, Perambalur District, Perambalur-621 212

3. The Special Tahsildar, Adi Dravidar Welfare/Land Acquisition, Ariyalur District, Perambalur District 621 704.

4. The Superintendent of Police, Ariyalur District, Ariyalur

5. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Jayamkundam, Ariyalur District

6. The Inspector of Police, T. Palur Police Station, T. Palur, Jayankundam Taluk, Ariyalur District

7. Tmt.Periammal

8. Tmt.Uma

9. C. Nehrudasan 10.P. Kaliyaperumal 11.P. Mahalingam .. Respondents

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents in particular the 6th respondent to give police protection to the Kanniamman Koil Masi Magam Festival which scheduled to be held on 11.03.2017 at the common land in Survey No.204/4 an extent of 0.41 acres situated in Irungaiyur village, Udayarpalayam Taluk, Ariyalur District on the basis of the representation given by the petitioner dated 10.02.2017. For Petitioner : Mr.M. Saravana Kumar For R.1 to R.6 : Mr.D. Vairamurthy Spl.Govt. Pleader O R D E R The petitioner has filed the present petition seeking to issue a writ of Mandamus directing the respondents in particular the 6th respondent to give police protection to the Kanniamman Koil Masi Magam Festival which scheduled to be held on 11.03.2017 at the common land in Survey No.204/4 an extent of 0.41 acres situated in Irungaiyur village, Udayarpalayam Taluk, Ariyalur District on the basis of the representation given by the petitioner dated 10.02.2017.

2.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition may be dismissed since by efflux of time, the prayer sought for in the writ petition has virtually become infructuous.

3.

In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs.

s/d- Assistant Registrar(CS-III) True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar sr To

1. The Commissioner and Secretary to Government Adi-Dravidar Welfare Department, Government of Tamil Nadu, Secretariat, Chennai - 600 009

2. The District Collector, Perambalur District, Perambalur-621 212

3. The Special Tahsildar, Adi Dravidar Welfare/Land Acquisition, Ariyalur District,Perambalur District 621 704.

4. The Superintendent of Police, Ariyalur District, Ariyalur

5. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Jayamkundam, Ariyalur District

6. The Inspector of Police, T. Palur Police Station, T. Palur, Jayankundam Taluk, Ariyalur District.

W.P.No.4283 of 2017 CP(CO) sp(13/07/2017)