← Library
Madras High CourtTCA/24/2009disposed of

The Director Of Income Tax v. M/S The Wellington

2019-07-30Honourable Mr Justice T. S. Sivagnanam,Honourable Mrs Justice V.Bhavani Subbaroyan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 30.07.2019 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN TCA.Nos.24 to 26 of 2009 The Director of Income Tax (Exemptions)-I, Chennai - 600 034.

..Appellant/ Appellant in all the appeals Vs.

M/s.The Wellingdon Charitable Trust, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai - 600 028.

..Respondent/ Respondent in all the appeals Prayer : Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras 'C' Bench, dated 15.04.2008 in I.T.A.No.1759, 1760 & 1761/Mds/07 for the assessment year 200102, 2003-04 and 2004-05 against the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-XI, Chennai made in ITA No.479,480 & 487/06-07, dated 09.02.2007 against the Deputy Director of Income Tax (Exemptions)-I, Chennai made in G.I.No./PAN 1646-T, dated 15.12.06 and G.I.No/PAN 1646-T, dated 15.12.06 and G.I.No./PAN 1646-T For Appellant in all the appeals : Mr.J.Narayanasamy Senior Standing Counsel For Respondent in all the appeals : Mr.A.S.Sriraman COMMON JUDGMENT [Judgment of the Court was delivered by T.S.Sivagnanam, J.] These appeals by the Revenue under Section 260 A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") are directed against the common order dated 15.04.2008 in I.T.A.No.1759, 1760 & 1761/Mds/07 for the assessment year 200102, 2003-04 and 2004-05.

2.We have heard Mr.J.Narayanasamy, learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the appellant/revenue and Mr.A.S.Sriraman, learned counsel appearing for the respondent/assessee. 3.The appeals have been admitted on the following substantial question of law :

"Whether in the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the income arising out of running/letting out of two auditoriums and hostel held by the assessee cannot be treated as assessable income of the trust as per the provisions of Section 11(4A)?"

4.The Tribunal in the impugned order referred to its earlier decisions on identical issue in the assessee's own case for the earlier assessment years and dismissed the appeals filed by the revenue. The decision of the Tribunal in the earlier assessment years was the subject matter of appeal before this Court in the case of Director of Income Tax (Exemptions) vs. Willington Charitable Trust [(2011) 330 ITR 0024(Mad)] and it was held that the substantial questions of law raised were answered in favour of the Revenue and in view of their reasoning that a business income, if utilized towards the achievement of the object of the assessee trust, would be incidental to the achievement of the object, the Division Bench of this Court deemed it fit to remand the assessment files to the AO to decide as to whether such business income was used for the attainment of the object and thereafter proceed in accordance with law. Ultimately, the orders passed by the Tribunal were set aside and those appeals were allowed to the extent indicated above.

5.Thus, following the above decision in the assessee's own case, the the common order passed by the Tribunal is hereby set aside and remanded to the Assessing Officer as has been ordered in (2011) 330 ITR 0024(Mad) and the appeals stand disposed of accordingly. No costs.

cse Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'C' Bench, Chennai.

2. The Commissioner of Income Tax, (Appeals-XI), Chennai - 34.

3. The Deputy Director of Income Tax, (Exemptions) -I, Chennai.

+1cc to Mr.S.Sridhar, Advocate, SR.No.65072 TCA.Nos.24 to 26 of 2009 Kak(18/09/2019)