← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/1574/2025granted

Praveen @ Praveen Kumar v. State Rep By,

2025-01-24Honourable Mr Justice A.D.Jagadish Chandira4 pages

CRL OP NO. 1574 of 2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 24-01-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA CRL OP NO. 1574 of 2025 Praveen @ Praveen Kumar S/O. Baskar, No.14/1, CK Manikaranar Street, Naravarikuppam, Chennai-52 Petitioner(s) Vs State Rep By, The Inspector of Police, Redhills police Station, Thiruvallur Diatrict . (Crime No. 13 of 2025) Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s):

P.Chandra Sekar M.Sathyasai Eswari M.Vetrivel M.Rajkumar For Respondent(s):

S.Santhosh Government Advocate (criminal Side) Madras High Court.

ORDER

Apprehending arrest in connection with Crime No.13 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 309(4), 311, 351(3) BNS Act, the present petition has been filed seeking anticipatory bail.

2. Pleading innocence on the part of the petitioner, false implication in the case, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks indulgence of this Court. He would submit that the petitioner is an innocent person and has nothing to do with the allegations made in the complaint. He would submit that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court.

3. The case of the prosecution as putforth by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent Police, opposing for grant of anticipatory bail, is that the petitioner abused the defacto complainant using filthy language and also robbed him of a sum of Rs.300/- at knife point. He would submit that the petitioner is having one previous case pending against him.

4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) for the respondent and perused the materials available on record.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is of the view that the petitioner may be granted bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Ponneri, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or the Police

officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the said Magistrate, on further condition that:

[a] if the petitioner fails to surrender before the said Magistrate within a period of fifteen days, this Order shall stand automatically cancelled; [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

[c] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]; [f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS.

24-01-2025 Lpp To

1. State Rep By, The Inspector of Police, Redhills police Station, Thiruvallur Diatrict .

(Crime No. 13 of 2025) A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J.

Lpp CRL OP NO. 1574 of 2025 24.01.2025