G.Antony Suresh v. State Rep By Its Inspector Of Police
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 02.02.2022
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI Crl.O.P.No.2194 of 2022 1.G.Antony Suresh 2.G.Antony Jebakumar ... Petitioners Vs.
State by,
...Respondent
The Inspector of Police, K-10, Koyambedu Police Station, Koyambedu, Chennai.
(CrimeNo.1047 of 2021) PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C prayed to enlarge the petitioners on bail, in the event of their arrest by the respondent police in the case pending investigation in Crime No.1047 of 2021, on the file of the respondent police.
For Petitioners : Mr.K.Balasubmraniam For Respondent : Mr.A.Gokulakrishnan Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER
The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 415 r/w 420 IPC, in Crime No.1047 of 2021, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that on 08.02.2020, the petitioners and the defacto complainant entered into a sale agreement for a sale consideration of Rs.38 lakhs and the defacto complainant paid a sum of Rs.10 lakhs as advance. Thereafter, the defacto complainant came to know that the property originally belongs to Pachiyappas Trust. Hence, the complaint.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and they been falsely implicated in this case. He
further submitted that the petitioner is ready to settle the issue. The learned counsel, on instructions, would further submit that the petitioners, without prejudice to their rights, are ready to deposit the amount of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Only) to the credit of the crime number. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
4.The learned Additional Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners stating that that the petitioners had cheated the defacto complainants to the tune of Rs.10,00,000/-.
5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering that the dispute is civil in nature, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners
6. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days after lifting of lockdown or the commencement of the Court's normal functioning whichever is earlier, before the V, Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:
(a)the petitioners shall deposit a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh Only) each to the credit of Crime No.1047 of 2021 within a period of fifteen (15) days after lifting of lockdown or the commencement of the Court's normal functioning whichever is earlier before the V Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore. On such deposit being made, the learned Magistrate, shall obtain an affidavit of undertaking from the defacto complainant stating that in the event of the petitioners succeeding the case, the amount of Rs.1,00,000/- deposited by the petitioners to the credit of Crime No.1047 of 2021 will be returned to the petitioners and after obtaining such affidavit of undertaking from the defacto complainant, shall disburse the said amount to the defacto complainant within a period of two weeks thereafter failing which, the anticipatory bail petition shall stands dismissed.
(b)the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Court concerned may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;
(c)the petitioners shall report before the respondent police on every Friday at 10.30.a.m., until further orders.
(d)the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;
(e)the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
(f)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; (g)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.
-sd/- 02/02/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO 1 THE V METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, EGMORE, CHENNAI.
2 THE CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, EGMORE, CHENNAI. [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, K-10, KOYAMBEDU POLICE STATION, KOYAMBEDU, CHENNAI 4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
+1CC to M/S K.BALASUBRAMANIAM Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.No.1839 CRL OP.2194/2022 Date :02/02/2022 CSK 11/02/2022