Tamilmani v. State Rep By
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01.02.2022
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI Crl.O.P.No.2069 of 2022 Tamilmani ... Petitioner Vs.
State represented by The Sub-Inspector of Police, Vettaikaran Iruppu Police Station, Nagapattinam District.
Crime No.276 of 2020.
... Respondent Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., praying to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest by the respondent police in Cr.No.276 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police.
For Petitioner : Mr.G.Pugazhenthi For Respondent : Mr.A.Gokulakrishnan Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER
(This case has been heard through video conference) The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under sections 379 IPC R/W Section 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, 1957, in Crime No.276 of 2020, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2.The case of the prosecution is that on 15.05.2020 at about 8.00 hrs., when the respondent police was involved in regular patrol, they found that the petitioner was found in illegal transportation of 1 unit of mixed sand in his vehicle bearing reg.No.TN-51-AH-2950. Hence, the complaint.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. However, on instructions, the learned counsel further submits that the petitioner, on his own volition, is ready and willing to contribute a sum of Rs.10,000/- to any Charitable Purpose as may be directed by this Court and he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that there is no previous case pending against the petitioner. However, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the submissions made by the both counsel and also the fact that the petitioner has willfully and on her own volition agreed to contribute a sum of Rs.10,000/- for charitable purpose, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen
(15) days after lifting of lockdown or the commencement of the Court's normal functioning whichever is earlier, before the Learned DM Cum JM, Vedharanyam, Nagapattinam District on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:
[a]the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) to the Registered Advocate Clerks Association at Nagapattinam District within a period of fifteen (15) days after lifting of lockdown or the commencement of the Court's normal functioning whichever is earlier and shall produce the said receipt before the Court below;
[b] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Court concerned may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;
[c] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30.a.m., until further orders.
[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;
[e] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
[f] on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions has been imposed and the petitioner is released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; [g] if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC;
-sd/- 01/02/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO 1 THE DM CUM JM,VEDHARANYAM, NAGAPATTINAM DISTRICT.
2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, NAGAPATTINAM DISTRICT (FOR INFORMATION).
3 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VETTAIKARAN IRUPPU POLICE STATION, NAGAPATTINAM DISTRICT.
4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
5 THE REGISTERED ADVOCATE CLERKS ASSOCIATION, NAGAPATTINAM DISTRICT.
+1 CC to M/S G.PUGAZHENTHI Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO.1633 CRL OP.2069/2022 Date :01/02/2022 INBA~10/02/2022