Madras High CourtCRP/1267/2014dismissed as infructuous

Bagiyam v. Prema

2017-01-31Honourable Mrs Justice Pushpa Sathyanarayana2 pages

`IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 31.01.2017

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA CRP PD No.1267 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014

1. Bagiyam

2. Ramesh

3. Rajesh

4. Sumathi .. Petitioners vs Prema .. Respondent Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order and decree dated 03.09.2013 made in I.A.No.6 of 2013 in C.M.A.(un-numbered) of 2013 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Ponneri.

For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondent : Mr.R.Muthukumar

ORDER

The revision is directed against an order refusing to condone the delay of 245 days in preferring C.M.A against I.A.No.6 of 2013. PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA.J

srn 2.

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner. However, Mr.R.Muthukumar, learned counsel appearing for the respondent submitted that the suit itself was disposed of as early as on 28.01.2015. Hence, the prayer in the revision petition has become infructuous. 3.

Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

31.01.2017 srn Index: yes/No Internet: yes To The Subordinate Court, Ponneri.

CRP PD No.1267 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014 http://www.judis.nic.in