Purushothaman v. State Rep By
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01.02.2022
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI Crl.O.P.No.2063 of 2022 Purushothaman .. Petitioner Vs.
State rep. by Inspector of Police Thirunindravur Police Station, Tiruvallur District.
Crime No.980 of 2021
...Respondent
Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of Cr.P.C., praying to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in Crime No.980 of 2021 pending investigation on the file of Inspector of Police Thirunindravur Police Station, Tiruvallur District. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Nambi Rajan For Respondent : Mr.N.S.Suganthan, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
ORDER
The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Section 341, 323, 397 and 506(ii) of IPC in Crime No.1235 of 2021, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that on 16.08.2021 at 10.30 p.m., the petitioner along with other accused were came into the defacto complainant's Hotel and ordered food items and thereafter, they had finished the dinner and went away from the Hotel without paid the amount for their food, the same was asked by the defacto complainant. Due to which, the petitioners and others abused the defacto complainant with filthy language, attacked him with knife and they were robbed a sum of Rs.3000/- from the defacto complainant's shirt pocket and criminally intimidated him and escaped from the occurrence place. Hence, the complaint.
3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has not been committed any such offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that one of the co-accused persons was released on bail. However, on instructions, he submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to pay a sum of Rs.5,000/- to any Charitable purpose as may be directed by this Court. Hence, the learned counsel prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submits that the investigation was almost completed.
5. Considering the fact that the investigation was almost completed and also the fact that the petitioner has willfully and on his own volition agreed to contribute a sum of Rs.5,000/- for charitable purpose, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen
(15) days after lifting of lockdown or the commencement of the Court's normal functioning whichever is earlier, before the learned District Magistrate-Cum-Judicial Magistrate-II, Tiruvallur, Tiruvallur District on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: [a] the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five thousand only) to the Registered Advocate Clerks Association, Tiruvallur within a period of fifteen (15) days after lifting of lockdown or the commencement of the Court's normal functioning whichever is earlier and shall produce the said receipt before the Court below;
[b] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Court concerned may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;
[c] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police on everyday at 10.30p.m for a period of four weeks and thereafter as and when required for an interrogation;
[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;
[e] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
[f] on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions has been imposed and the petitioner is released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; [g] if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC;
-sd/- 01/02/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO 1 THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE -CUM-JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE-II, TIRUVALLUR, TIRUVALLUR DISTRICT.
2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUVALLUR DISTRICT (FOR INFORMATION).
3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE , THIRUNINDRAVUR POLICE STATION, TIRUVALLUR DISTRICT.
4 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
5 THE REGISTERED ADVOCATE CLERKS ASSOCIATION, TIRUVALLUR.
+1 CC to M/S. S.NAMBIRAJAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO.1529 CRL OP.2063/2022 Date :01/02/2022 INBA~11/02/2022