V.Gunasekaran v. A.Senthilkumar

Crl.O.P.No.14527 of 2023 in Crl.A.S.R.No.3916 of 2023 R.HEMALATHA, J Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Though the signature on the cheque in question, was admitted by the accused, the trial Court, without taking into account the presumption under Sections 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, had held that the present cheque could have been issued along with the transaction in C.C.No.177 of 2013. It is pertinent to point out that C.C.No.177 of 2013 was filed by a different complainant. In the circumstances, as there are arguable points in the appeal, leave sought for is granted.

2. Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order and list it "for admission" in the usual course.

03.07.2023 cs https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis