Ponnusamy v. State Rep By

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

The petitioners, who apprehend arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) IPC in Cr.No.15 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that there was a previous enmity between the the petitioner's family and the defacto complainant. On 14.1.2023 at about 3.45 pm when the defacto complainant and his wife who is elder son were working on their field, his younger son brought the tractor to the public pathway. On seeing that both the petitioners got annoyed and started abused the defacto complainant's family. They attacked the defacto complainant when his mother-in-law intervened and she also suffered some injuries. Hence, the case.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Hence, the learned counsel prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 1/4

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) would submit that civil dispute had ended in crime complaint. He opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5. Considering the fact that this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

6.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Dharapuram, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: (a)the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Court concerned may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity; 2/4

(b)the 1st petitioner shall report before the respondent police on every Saturday for a period of six weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation;

( c) the 2nd petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when require for interrogation;

(d)the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(e)the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial; (f)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

(g)if the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

30.01.2023 vsn 3/4

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

vsn 30.01.2023 4/4