Madras High CourtWP/8318/2017disposed of

D.Suresh Babu v. The Collector

2017-04-07Honourable Mr Justice M.Duraiswamy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 07.04.2017

CORAM

THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY W.P.No.8318 of 2017 D.Suresh Babu ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The Collector, Kancheepuram District, Kancheepuram.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tambaram, Chennai.

3. The Tahsildar, Sholinganallur, Chennai.

... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to dispose of the petitioner's representation dated 02.03.2015 by way of rectifying his name in adangal (revenue record) from C.Babu to Dorairajan Suresh Babu for his property situated at No.154, Jallatenpet Village, Old S.No.218, New Survey No.218/2 as per Patta 287/5, Plot No.49, Medavakkam, Chennai - 600 100 now called as 4th Street, Pallavan Nagar as in Patta No.633 measuring an extent of 2200* sq.ft and measured as 1995 sq.ft.

For Petitioner : Mr.N.Doraikannan For Respondents : Mr.A.N.Thambidurai, Special Government Pleader

O R D E R

The petitioner has filed the above Writ Petition to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 02.03.2015 by rectifying his name in Adangal as Dorairajan Suresh Babu instead of C.Babu for his property situated at No.154, Jallatenpet Village, Old S.No.218, New Survey No.218/2 as per Patta 287/5, Plot No.49, Medavakkam, Chennai - 600 100, now called as 4th Street, Pallavan Nagar as in Patta No.633 measuring an extent of 2200* sq.ft and measured as 1995 sq.ft.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that inspite of the petitioner's representation dated 02.03.2015 to rectify the mistake as stated above, the 3rd respondent has not rectified the same yet. 3.Mr.A.N.Thambidurai, learned Special Government Pleader taking notice for the respondents submitted that the 3rd respondent may be directed to consider the petitioner's representation and pass orders in accordance with law. 4.Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, taking into consideration the limited prayer sought for by the petitioner, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I direct the 3rd respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 02.03.2015 and pass orders, on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5.With these observations, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS V) dt. 13.4.2017 Corrected order as per of this court, dated 28.4.2017 Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-V) dt 28.4.17 //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar va To

1. The Collector, Kancheepuram District, Kancheepuram.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, To be substituted the order Tambaram, Chennai.

already despatched on

3. The Tahsildar, 27.04.2017 Sholinganallur, Chennai.

+2ccs to Mr.N.Doraikannan, Advocate, S.R.No.26345 W.P.No.8318 of 2017 KS(CO) CA(17/04/2017) EU 28.04.2017 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/