Sutherland Global Service Pvt Ltd v. Candor Management Services Private Ltd And 4 Others

A.No.2396 of 2020 in C.S.No.490 of 2019 C.V.KARTHIKEYAN J, The 1st defendant had filed a written statement along with the counter claim. This necessitated the plaintiff to file a reply to the same. However, there is a delay of 58 days in filing the reply statement. This Application has to be filed seeking to condone the delay. 2.In the Application filed in support of the said application, it had been stated that the officer at various branches and at various levels were involved to give instructions with respect to the responses to the various allegations stated in the written statement. It was therefore stated that there was some delay in giving instructions to the counsel to prepare the written statement to the counter claim made by the 1st defendant. 3.Heard learned counsel for the 1st defendant also. 1/2 http://www.judis.nic.in

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN J, smv 4.Taking into consideration the fact that it would only be in the interest of all the parties that the issues raised are settled on merits, the delay is condoned and the reply statement of the plaintiff insofar as counter claim of the 1st defendant is concerned is taken on file. 16.10.2020 smv A.No.2396 of 2020 in C.S.No.490 of 2019 2/2 http://www.judis.nic.in