Ramadoss v. Narasimman

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 07.03.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA S.A.N o.678 of 2010

1. Ramadoss

2. Thippanna ... Appellants ..Vs..

1.Narasimman

2. Chinna Narasimman

3. Srinivasan

4. Kamalesh

5. Muni Rathnamma

6. Salamma

7. Narayanappa ... Respondents PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 C.P.C., against the decree and judgment dated 02.11.2007 in A.S.No.5 of 2006 on the file of the District Judge, Hosur, upholding the decree and judgment in O.S.No.405 of 1996 dated 30.12.2005 on the file of the District Munsif, Hosur.

For Appellants : No appearance For R1 to R3 : Ms.R. Abirami for M/s. V. Srimathi 1/3

JUDGMENT

When the second appeal came up for hearing on 06.03.2023, there was no representation for the appellants and hence the Registry was directed to post this matter under the caption "for dismissal' on 07.03.2023. Even today, i.e., 07.03.2023, there is no representation for the appellants. The learned counsel for the respondents 1 to 3 is present.

2. In view of the same, the Second Appeal is dismissed for nonprosecution. No costs. 07.03.2023 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No bga To

1. The District Judge, Hosur.

2. The District Munsif, Hosur.

3. The Section Officer, V.R. Section, High Court, Madras. R. HEMALATHA, J.

2/3

bga 07.03.2023 3/3