← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/26204/2016closed

Selva, Aged 62 Years, v. State Rep. By,

2021-06-21Honourable Mrs Justice V.Bhavani Subbaroyan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 21.06.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE V.BHAVANI SUBBAROYAN CRL.O.P.No.26204 of 2016 and CRL.M.P.Nos.13019 and 13020 of 2016 1.Selva W/o. Umapathy 2.Umapathy S/o. Kannappan (Late) 3.Baladhandapani S/o. Late Seetharaman 4.Revathy W/o. Baladhandapani ... Petitioners/Accused No 2 to 5 Vs.

1.State rep. by The Inspector of Police, W-8, All Women Police Station Thirumangalam, Chennai - 600 101 (Crime No. 978 of 2014) ... Respondent/Complainant 2.V.Jayalakshmi D/o.Late Varadhan .... Respondents/Defacto Complainant PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., to call for the records pertaining to the impugned charge sheet in C.C.No.2899 of 2016 on the file of the X Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai and quash the charges against the petitioners of the charge sheet and the entire proceedings pending against the petitioners in C.C.No.2899 of 2016 on the file of X Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai. For Petitioner : Mr.V.Sairam For Respondent-1 : Mr.E.Rajthilak Counsel for Government (Crl. Side) For Respondent-2 : Not Ready Note

O R D E R

(This case has been heard through video conference) This Criminal Original Petition has been filed by the petitioners seeking to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.2899 of 2016 on the file of the X Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the 2nd respondent is the defacto complainant and the petitioners / A2 to A5 are the in-laws of the defacto complainant. The marriage between the defacto complainant and A1 took place on 18.11.2009 and out of the said wedlock, they were blessed with twin children. While so, the petitioners along with A1 harassed and committed cruelty on the defacto complainant by demanding dowry. Therefore, based on the complaint given by the defacto complainant, FIR was came tobe registered in Crime No.978 of 2014 by the 1st respondent police. After completion of investigation, the respondent police filed charge sheet and the case is taken up in C.C.No.2899 of 2016 on the file of the X Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai.

3. When the matter is taken up for hearing today, the learned Counsel for the Government (Crl. Side) would submit that the trial has already been commenced and the defacto complainant's chief examination is over. The learned counsel further submitted that the matter is adjourned for examination of further witnesses.

4. In view of the above facts and circumstances of the case, the trial Court is directed to complete the trial within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition disposed of. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ksa-2

To 1.The X Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, Chennai 2.The Inspector of Police, W-8, All Women Police Station Thirumangalam, Chennai - 600 101.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras, Chennai.

CRL.O.P.No.26204 of 2016 and CRL.M.P.Nos.13019 and 13020 of 2016 PMK (CO) PR (02/08/2021)