Mullaiyammal v. Rajeswari

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 08.07.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA SA.No.77 of 2010 and MP.No.1 of 2010 1.Mullaiyammal 2.Kathiravan ... Appellants/Defendants 1 &2 .Vs.

1.Rajeswari ...1st Respondent/ Plaintiff 2.Arivarasan 3.Saroja 4.Veeramani 5.Tamilmani 6.Porkodi ... Respondents 2 to 6/ /Defendants 3 to 7 PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the decree and Judgment dated 28.04.2008 in AS.No.19 of 2007 on the file of the District Court, Nagapattinam against the decree and Judgment dated 21.03.2007 in OS.No.11 of 2006 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Nagapattinam.

For Appellants : No appearance For Respondents: Mr.T.Murugamanickam for R3, R5 and R6 No appearance for R1, R2 and R4

JUDGMENT

On 19.06.2019, when this matter came up for hearing, there was no representation for the appellants and hence was directed to be posted under the caption 'for dismissal' on 20.06.2019. Subsequently, on 20.06.2019, it was represented by a junior https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

counsel that Mr.T.Ravichandran, learned counsel who appeared for the appellants in this matter passed away and at the request of the junior counsel, it was adjourned to 08.07.2019 for advancing arguments. However, today also, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants. The learned counsel for the third, fifth and sixth respondents is present.

2. In the facts and circumstances, this Second Appeal is dismissed for default. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

mbi Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VI) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The District Court, Nagapattinam.

2.The Subordinate Court, Nagapattinam.

SA.No.77 of 2010 and MP.No.1 of 2010 Kak(27/09/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/