Kumarasamy Mooopanar, v. The Tahsildar,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 14.03.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA S.A.No. 808 of 2010 and M.P. No.1 of 2010 Kumarasamy Moopanar ... Appellant Vs.

1. The Tahsildar, Thittakudi, Cuddalore District.

2. The District Collector, Cuddalore.

3. Baskar

4. Balakrishna Maruthuvar

5. Dakshinamoorthy ... Respondents Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 CPC against the decree and judgment dated 31.08.2009 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Vriddhachalam, in A.S. No.55 of 2006, upholding the decree and judgment dated 23.08.2004 on the file of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thittakudi, in O.S. No.181 of 1997.

For Appellant : No appearance For R1 to R2 : Ms. S.V. Supraja Government Advocate

JUDGMENT

It is seen from the records that the sole appellant died long back and till date no steps have been taken by the appellant's counsel to implead the legal heirs of the deceased sole appellant even though several adjournments were granted in this regard. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the appellant.

2. In view of the same, this second appeal is dismissed as abated. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

bga To 1.The Principal Subordinate Judge, Vriddhachalam. 2.The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thittakudi.

3. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras. S.A.No. 808 of 2010 PA(CO) A.SK(28/03/2022) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/