V.N. Balakrishnan v. The Commissioner Of

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 12.03.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.No.16362 of 2003 V.N.Balakrishnan ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, Chepauk, Chennai 5.

2. The District Collector, Coimbatore District.

3. The Deputy Commissioner (Excise), Coimbatore. ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records relating to the order of the 3rd respondent dated 15.5.2003 in Na.Ka.Kou.7/84/2003 and the consequential notice of the 3rd respondent dated 31.5.2003 in Na.Ka.Kou.7/84/2003 and quash the same.

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Ethirajulu For Respondents : Mr.J.Ramesh, AGP

O R D E R

When the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submitted that the relief sought for herein has become infructuous and hence, nothing survives for adjudication in this writ petition. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.In view of the above submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(ADI MDU) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar av To

1. The Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, Chepauk, Chennai 5.

2. The District Collector, Coimbatore District.

3. The Deputy Commissioner (Excise), Coimbatore.

+1cc to the Government Pleader SR.23205 W.P.No.16362 of 2003 JP(CO) CB(28/05/2020) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/