S.Narasimman v. G.Leelavathi

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 20.12.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.PONGIAPPAN S.A.No.814 of 2010 and M.P.No.1 of 2010 1.S.Narasimman 2.T.Krishnapriya 3.S.Banu @ Banu Priya ...Appellants/Defendants versus G.Leelavathi

...Respondent/Plaintiff

PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree dated 29.04.2010 made in A.S.No.62 of 2004 on the file of the District Court, Tiruvannamalai, confirming the judgment and decree dated 23.08.2002 made in O.S.No.341 of 2000 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Arni.

For Appellants : No Appearance For Respondent : Mr.K.Harishankar

J U D G M E N T

When this Second Appeal was taken up for hearing on 16.12.2021, the learned counsel appearing for the appellants present and filed a memo stating that he had no instructions from the appellants.

2.

In view of the above, this Court directed the Registry to list this matter today under the caption "for dismissal". Further, directed the Registry to print the name of the appellants in the cause list.

3.

Though this matter was listed today under the caption "for dismissal", there was no representation on behalf of the appellants.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4.

Hence, this Second Appeal is dismissed for default. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. However, there is no order as to costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-IV) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar sri To 1.The District Judge, Tiruvannamalai.

2.The Subordinate Judge, Arni.

+1cc to Mr.K.Harishankar, Advocate SR. No.68829 S.A.No.814 of 2010 and M.P.No.1 of 2010 GSM (CO) PR (05/01/2022) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/