S.Easwaran v. The Tahsildar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 06.04.2023 CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.15875 of 2013 and M.P.No.2 of 2013 S.Easwaran ..
Petitioner vs
1. The Tahsildar Palladam Taluk Office Palladam, Tiruppur District.
2. Subashini
3. V.Paramashewaran
4. A.Rangasamy
5. N.Sellammal
6. Pappammal
7. S.Sunderraj
8. C.Palani
9. C.Kandasamy
10. Revathi
11. R.Natarajan
12. N.Sarojini
13. E.Subramanian
14. K.Rajalakshmi
15. Mahindra Babu [R2 to R15 impleaded vide order dated 04.07.2013 in M.P.No.1 of 2013 in W.P.No.15875 of 2013] ..
Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondent to consider and dispose of the petitioner representation dated 20.05.2013 seeking patta for S.No.432, Palladam, Tiruppur District.
For Petitioner : Mr.MA.P.Thangavel For Respondents : Mr.T.Arun Kumar Additional Government Pleader for R 1 Mr.Mukund R.Pandian for R3 to R4 and R6 to R9 Mr.K.Govi Ganesan for R10 to R13 Mr.R.Bharathkumar for R15 Not ready in notice for R2, R5 and R14
ORDER
The relief sought for in the present writ petition is to direct the first respondent to consider and dispose of the representation dated 20.05.2013, seeking patta for S.No.432, Palladam, Tiruppur District.
2. For grant of patta or cancellation of patta or mutation of revenue records, the aggrieved person has to submit an application in the prescribed format under the provisions of the Patta Passbook Act. Mere representation would be insufficient for grant of patta or its cancellation or otherwise. The Act contemplates certain procedures and an enquiry is to
be conducted with reference to grant of patta or cancellation or for mutation of revenue records and therefore, the relief as such sought for in the present writ petition is misconceiving.
3. The petitioner has to submit appropriate application before the competent authority by following the procedures for grant of patta or cancellation or for mutation of revenue records or otherwise. Thus, the petitioner is at liberty to file appropriate application in the manner known to law.
4. With these directions, the writ petition is disposed of. There will be no order as to costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.
06.04.2023 Index : Yes/No drm To:
1. The Tahsildar Palladam Taluk Office Palladam, Tiruppur District.
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, J.
drm 06.04.2023