Madras High CourtWP/9363/2017disposed of

D.Sureesh v. The District Collector,

2017-06-08Honourable Mr Justice K. Ravichandrabaabu2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 08.06.2017

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAVICHANDRABAABU Writ Petition No.9363 of 2017 and WMP.No.10334 of 2017 D.Sureesh .... Petitioner Vs.

1.The District Collector, Office of the Collectorate, Coimbatore.

2.The Manager, Tasmac Coimbatore 3.The Inspector of Police, Sulur Police Station, Coimbatore ....Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of writ of mandamus directing the respondents not to locate any wine shop near Thenampalayam, Rasipalayam Main Road at Arasur Village, Sulur Taluk as per the representations of the petitioner dated 20.03.2017. For Petitioner : Mr.Liagat Ali For Respondents : Mr. K. Venkataramani Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr. John Kennedy for R2 Mr.M.Elumalai Government Advocate for R1 and R3

O R D E R

This writ petition is filed for a mandamus directing the respondents not to locate any Wine Shop near Thenampalayam, Rasipalayam main road at Arasur Village, Sulur taluk as per the representation of the petitioner dated 20.03.2017. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. When this Court heard the matter for admission on 18.04.2017, the learned Government Advocate was directed to take instructions and also directed the respondents to maintain status quo as on that date.

3. Today when the matter is taken for further hearing the learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the second respondent submitted that the proposal to locate a wine shop at the disputed site has already been dropped and therefore the petitioner cannot have any grievance.

4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the above submissions made by the learned Additional Advocate General may be recorded and the writ petition may be closed.

5. Considering the above said facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made on either side the writ petition is disposed of by recording the above statement made by the learned Additional Advocate General.

Accordingly the writ petition is disposed of. No Costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar mk/dna To 1.The District Collector, Coimbatore.

2.The Inspector of Police, Sulur Police Station, Coimbatore.

+1cc to Mr.John Kennady, Advocate, S.R.No.41150 +1cc to Mr.M.Liagat Ali, Advocate, S.R.No.41028 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.41293 Writ Petition No.9363 of 2017 RS(19/06/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/