Perumal S/O Raji v. The Spl. Commissionr &

W.P.Nos. 28434 & 28934 of 2007

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 15.09.2023 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M. SUBRAMANIAM W.P.Nos.28434 & 28934 of 2007 Perumal .. Petitioner in both WPs vs 1.The Special Commissioner & Commissioner of Land Administration, Chepauk, Chennai - 5.

2.The District Revenue Officer (DRO) Kancheepuram 3.The Tahsildar, Chengalpattu.

4.K.Nehru .. Respondents in both WPs Prayer in W.P.No.28434 of 2007:

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of certiorari calling for the records in impugned proceedings RC.3971/2007/A1 dated 09.08.2007 passed by the third respondent and quash the same. Prayer in W.P.No.28934 of 2007:

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records in respect of the impugned proceedings RC.K3/25163/2007 dated 16.08.2007 passed by the first respondent and quash the same and further direct the first respondent to pass an order granting stay of the order of the second respondent dated 18.07.2007 in proceedings R.C.25847/2007/No.4.

For Petitioner :

Mr.S.Balaji (in both writ petitions) For Respondents :

Mr.T.Venkateshkumar Spl.GP for R1 to R3 Mr.K.M.Balaji for R4 (in both writ petitions) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/2

W.P.Nos. 28434 & 28934 of 2007 S.M. SUBRAMANIAM,J.

ssm COMMON ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner made a submission that despite the efforts taken, he is unable to secure any instructions from the petitioner to get along with the case. 2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner reported no instructions. Accordingly, writ petitions stand closed. No costs. 15.09.2023 Index:Yes ssm To 1.The Special Commissioner & Commissioner of Land Administration, Chepauk, Chennai - 5.

2.The District Revenue Officer (DRO) Kancheepuram 3.The Tahsildar, Chengalpattu.

W.P.Nos.28434 & 28934 of 2007 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/2