Dakshinamurthy v. Velayudham

C.M.P.No.12729 of 2016 in A.S.S.R.No.51516 of 2016 P.T.ASHA, J.

Learned Counsel, R.Murali entered appearance for respondents 2, 6 and 7.

2.The appellant has filed a memo dated 28.09.2021, stating that since there is no subsisting interest for the 5th respondent in the suit property, the appellant would not proceed against the 5th respondent.

3.The memo is taken on file. The proceedings against the 5 respondent is dismissed.

4.An application is filed for condoning the delay of 6 days in filing the appeal.

5.Sufficient reasons have been given in the affidavit filed in support of the application and accordingly, the delay is condoned. 6.Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in http://www.judis.nic.in 1/2

order.

01.10.2021 gd/shr http://www.judis.nic.in 2/2