S.V.Shanmugham v. Angammal

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 16.03.2018

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI S.A. No.1526 of 1998 1.Manikkammal (deceased) 2.S.V.Shanmugam (Brought on record as L.R. And as 2nd appellant as per order of D.R.in CMP.5409/97 dt.10.07.97) ..Appellants Vs.

Late Govindasamy Nainar 1.Angammal 2.Kannan (RR 2 & 3 are LRs.of the 1st respondent) (C.T. Accepted as per order of D.R. in CMP.5410/97 dt.10.07.97) 3.Thayee Ammal 4.Kalyani Ammal 5.Siva Booshanam 6.Thanikachalam ..Respondents Prayer:- Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree dated 21.01.1995 made in A.S.No.42/94 on the file of the Subordinate Court, Thiruvannamalai, reversing the judgment and decree of the District Munsif Court, Thiruvanamalai and made in O.S.No.1436 of 1980 dated 09.09.1993.

For Appellant : No Appearance For Respondents: M/s.V.Raghavachari for R2 for R1, R3 & R4 - No Appearance Not ready on notice Reg. R5 & R6

J U D G M E N T

When the second appeal was taken up for hearing on 08.03.2018, there was no representation for the appellant and https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

hence, the matter was ordered to be posted under the caption 'for dismissal '.

2. Even though, the matter is listed today under the caption 'for dismissal', neither the appellant nor his counsel is present to prosecute the matter. Hence the second appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True copy// Sub Assistant Registrar kas To 1.The Subordinate Judge Thiruvannamalai 2.The District Munsif Judge Thiruvanamalai +1cc to Mr.V.Ragavachari, Advocate SR.No.20234 S.A.No.1526 of 1998 PPA(CO) GN(26/04/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/