Annamalai v. Kasinathan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 02.03.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI S.A.No.1364 of 1998 Annamalai ...Appellant/1st defendant Vs.

1.Kasinathan

...Respondent No.1/ Plaintiff

2.Gopal 3.Kaliamurthy 4.Narasinga Perumal ... Respondents No.2 to 4/ defendants 2-4 Prayer: The Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 of C.P.C. against the Judgment and decree dated 30.09.1997 made in A.S.No.144 of 1995 on the file of Subordinate Judge, Cuddalore, confirming the judgment and decree dated 13.09.1995 made in O.S.No.522 of 1994 on the file of Additional District Munsif.

For Appellant : No Appearance For Respondents : R1 - Died R2 to R4 No Appearance

J U D G M E N T

When the second appeal was taken up for hearing on 01.03.2018, there was no representation for the appellant and hence, the matter was ordered to be posted under the caption ' for dismissal '.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. Even though, the matter is listed today under the caption 'for dismissal', neither the appellant nor his counsel is present to prosecute the matter. Hence the Second Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs.

kas Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CSVIII) /TRUE COPY/ Sub-Assistant Registrar To.

1.The Subordinate Court Cuddalore 2.The Additional District Munsif Cuddalore 3.The Section Officer V.R.Section High Court of Madras Chennai 600 104 S.A.No.1364 of 1998 SKS[CO] MK:26/03/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/