R.Kumar v. The Tahsildar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 21.06.2019 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MRS.V.K.TAHILRAMANI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY W.P.NO.21569 OF 2003 R.Kumar Rep. by Power of Attorney, M.D.R.Tajudeen.

.. Petitioner -vsThe Tahsildar, Ambathur, Chennai.

.. Respondent Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issue of Writ of Mandamus to forbear the respondent from interfering with the re-construction of the building in Door No.96, S.No.46/1, Grama Natham, Puzhal, Chennai, till patta is granted.

For Petitioner :

No appearance For Respondent :

Mr.S.N.Parthasarathy Govt. Advocate.

O R D E R

(Order of the Court was made by The Hon'ble Chief Justice) There is no representation for the petitioner. So also, on the earlier two dates, i.e., on 20.06.2019 and 19.06.2019, there was no representation for the petitioner.

2.In the order dated 20.06.2019, it is reflected that there was no representation for the petitioner on that date, so also on the earlier date, i.e., 19.06.2019, hence, the matter be posted for dismissal on 21.06.2019, i.e., today. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3.As stated earlier, today also, there is no appearance for the petitioner. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for nonprosecution. Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar sra To The Tahsildar, Ambathur, Chennai.

W.P.No.21569 of 2003 AP(CO) CS/25/07/2019 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/