← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/2414/2025dismissed

Prabakaran @ Thokki v. State Rep.By, The Sub Inspector Of Police,

2025-02-07Honourable Mr Justice A.D.Jagadish Chandira4 pages

CRL OP NO. 2414 of 2025

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 07-02-2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA CRL OP NO. 2414 of 2025 Prabakaran @ Thokki S/o.Nagaraj, 423, V O C Nagar, Athipattu Post, Athipattu, Thiruvallur.

Petitioner(s) Vs State Rep.By, The Sub Inspector Of Police, Minjur Police Station, Redhills District. (Crime No.481 of 2024) Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s):

Sasikumar R B. Sasikala S. Sathya V. Sangavi For Respondent(s):

Mr.S.Santhosh, Government Advocate (crl Side)

ORDER

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 118(1) & 351 (3) of BNS in Crime No.481 of 2024, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that on 26.08.2024, when the de facto complainant was at his house, the petitioner along with other accused arrived there and took him to

Amudha nagar ground. Where, they assaulted him with beer bottle and used filthy language to abuse him. Hence the case.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. The learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4.Learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police while opposing for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner submitted that due to a quarrel the petitioner/A1 assaulted the de facto complainant, resulted in head injuries and the de facto complainant was later discharged from the hospital. He further submitted that the petitioner/A1 is a history sheeter. He further submitted that the petitioner is A1 in this case and he has five previous cases, the same is extracted hereunder:

|S.No.

FIR No Section Stage of Case 263/2 399-IPC Under Investigation 112/2 294(b),341,392,397,427, 506(2) - IPC Under Investigation 228/2 429-IPC @ 34,429 - IPC Under Investigation 225/2 147,148,307,324,506(2) - IPC @ 147,148,149,307,341 - IPC Pending Trial 609/2 147,148,294(b),307,323, 324,341,506(2) @ 147,148,149,294(b),307, 341,506(2) -IPC Pending Trial 5.Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record. 6.Taking into consideration the facts and the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) and considering the fact that the petitioner has five previous cases and is a history sheeter, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

7.Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 07-02-2025 msv To The Sub Inspector Of Police, Minjur Police Station, Redhills District.