V.Munivel v. The Tahsildhar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 25.08.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR WMP.Nos. 2989 and 2991 of 2019 V.Munivel .. Petitioner vs The Tahsildar, Uthukottai Taluk, Tiruvallur District.

.. Respondent Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records on the file of the respondent relating to the impugned order passed in Rc.2261/2018/A3 dated 30.11.2018, quash the same and direct the respondent to reinstate the petitioner into service and to treat the period of Suspension as duty for all purposes and grant him all consequential service and monetary benefits.

For Petitioner : Mr.G.Saran for Mr.M.Ravi For Respondent : Mrs.S.Anitha Special Government Pleader 1/3

ORDER

Mr.G.Saran, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survives for consideration and thus the writ petition has become infructuous. He also made an endorsement to that effect.

2. Recording the same, the writ petition is closed as infructuous. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. No costs. 25.08.2025 Speaking order / Non-speaking order Index : Yes / No : Yes / No msv To The Tahsildar, Uthukottai Taluk, Tiruvallur District.

2/3

T. VINOD KUMAR , J.

msv WMP.Nos. 2989 and 2991 of 2019 25.08.2025 3/3