Julimetillda v. Puthiyaraja

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 06.10.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN C.R.P.NO.1035 OF 2018 AND C.M.P.NO.5449 OF 2018 Julimetillda

...Petitioner

Vs.

Puthiyaraja ..Respondent Prayer: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the fair and decreetal order dated 29.04.2017 made in I.A.No. 47 of 2016 in I.D.O.P.No. 7 of 2015 on the file of the Principal District cum Sessions Judge, Ariyalur and consequently award the amount as prayed for in I.A.No.47 of 2016 in I.D.O.P.No. 7 of 2015.

For Petitioner : Mr.Arockiadass For Respondent : Mrs.Elizabeth Ravi

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that they had given change of Vakalat even in the month of June 2019. No new counsel is appearing. It is therefore, clear that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this civil revision petition.

2. Hence, this civil revision petition is dismissed for nonprosecution. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar kkn https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To:

The Principal District cum Sessions Judge, Ariyalur.

Copy To The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras-104.

C.R.P.No.1035 of 2018 and C.M.P.No.5449 of 2018 PP(CO) CS/10/11/2020 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/