Devavenkatrathinam v. The State Of Tamilnadu
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 27.03.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM W.P.No.727 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014 Thiru.Devavenkatrathinam, President, Ammanur Village Panchayat, Arakkonam Panchayat Union, Arakkonam Taluk, Vellore District.
...Petitioner
Versus
1.The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by its Principal Secretary to Government, Fort St.George, Chennai -9.
2.The Collector, Vellore District, Vellore.
3.The Tahsildar, Arakkonam.
4.The Arakkonam Municipality, Arakkonam, Vellore District, Rep.by its Commissioner.
.. Respondents Prayer: The Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to invoke the jurisdiction conferred upon it under Section 369 of the Tamil Nadu District Municipalities Act and determine the dispute between the petitioner and the 4th respondent pertaining to the location of the SIDCO Industrial Estate, Ammanur Village, Arakkonam Taluk, Vellore District.
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
For Petitioner : Mr.G.Jeremiah For Respondents : Mr.B.Anand Government Advocate, for R1 to R3 Mr.S.S.Swaminathan, for R4
O R D E R
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the respondents submitted that the prayer sought in this writ petition has become infructuous.
2. Recording the submission made by the learned counsel on either side, this writ petition is dismissed having become infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ms To 1.The Principal Secretary to Government, The State of Tamil Nadu, Fort St.George, Chennai -9.
2.The Collector, Vellore District, Vellore.
3.The Tahsildar, Arakkonam.
+1cc to Mr.S.S.SWAMINATHAN, Advocate, S.R.No. 23911 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No. 24336 & 25217 W.P.No.727 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014 TR(10/04/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/