Vicky @ Vignesh v. State Rep By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 02.02.2022

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI CRL.O.P.No.2388 of 2022 1.Vicky @ Vignesh

...Petitioners

2.Rajesh @ Pulimoottai Rajesh

Versus

The State represented by

...Respondent

The Inspector of Police, R-6, Kumaran Nagar Police Station, Chennai.

(Crime No.22 of 2022) Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in Crime No.22 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police.

For Petitioners: Mr.P.Surendran For Respondent : Mr.N.S.Suganthan Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

ORDER

The petitioners, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 457, 380 of IPC in Crime No.22 of 2022, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the Tamil Nadu Government announced Full lock down due to Covid restriction on 23.01.2022. On that day the Government TASMAC closed. On 23.01.2022 closed the TASMAC and Tasmac worker returned to morning dated 24.01.2022. To an shock and surprised that the TASMAC shop lock has been opened by unknown person and theft the liquor bottles. Hence this case.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and they have been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the petitioner theft the liquor bottles in the TASMAC. However, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

6. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days after lifting of lockdown or the commencement of the Court's normal functioning whichever is earlier, before the learned XXIII Metropolitan Magistrate at Saidapet, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that: [a] the petitioners are directed to deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) [Rs.5000/- each] to the credit of the Tamil Nadu Registered Advocate Clerks Association, Chennai within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and shall produce the said receipt before the Court below.

[b] the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.

[c] the petitioners are directed to report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders;

[d] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[e] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on anticipatory bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC. -sd/- 02/02/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, NO.XXIII, SAIDAPET, CHENNAI.

2 THE CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, EGMORE, CHENNAI. [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, R-6, KUMARAN NAGAR POLICE STATION, CHENNAI.

5 THE REGISTERED ADVOCATE CLERKS ASSOCIATION, HIGH COURT, CHENNAI.

+1 CC to M/S.G.PANDIAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO.1787 CRL OP.2388/2022 Date :02/02/2022 TA-11/02/2022