← Library
Madras High CourtWP/2012/2022disposed of

C.Ramasamy v. The Revenue Divisional Officer

2022-02-09Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 09.02.2022 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANI W.P. No.2012 of 2022 C.Ramasamy ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sirkali, Mayiladudurai District

2. The Tahsildhar, Sirkali, Mayiladudurai District.

3. The Land Surveyor, Puthur Circle, Sirkali, Mayiladudurai District.

4. The Village Administrative Officer, Thirumaladi Village No.13, Sirkali, Mayiladudurai District.

... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to consider petitioner's representation dated 09.12.2021 and conduct measurement of petitioner's land situated at S.F.No.345/5B (Old No.345/5) in Thirumaladi Village, Sirkali within stipulated time. For Petitioner : Sam Jayaraj Houston For Respondent : Mr.A.Anandan, Government Advocate

O R D E R

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to consider petitioner's representation dated 09.12.2021 and conduct measurement of petitioner's land situated at S.F.No.345/5B (Old No.345/5) in Thirumaladi Village, Sirkali.

2. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is the owner of the aforesaid property, measuring an extent of about 1989 sq ft. The grievance of the petitioner is that the petitioner has made several representations to the 2nd respondent/The Tahsildhar to measure the petitioner's land in the aforesaid premises. Despite the same, till date the 2nd respondent/The Tahsildhar has not passed any order. Hence, the present Writ Petition has been filed.

3.Though very many grounds have been raised, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it would be suffice if this Court issues a direction to the 2nd respondent/The Tahsildhar to consider the petitioner's representation dated 09.12.2021 and pass orders on the same within a particular time frame fixed by this Court.

4. The learned Government Advocate fairly submitted that he has no objection for the said order being passed. 5.In view of the aforesaid submissions, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, directs the 2nd respondent/The Tahsildhar to consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 09.12.2021 on merits and in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. This writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs.

SD/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR // TRUE COPY // SUB ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

jd/psa To

1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Sirkali, Mayiladudurai District

2. The Tahsildhar, Sirkali, Mayiladudurai District.

3. The Land Surveyor, Puthur Circle, Sirkali, Mayiladudurai District.

4. The Village Administrative Officer, Thirumaladi Village No.13, Sirkali, Mayiladudurai District.

+1cc to M/s.Sam Jayaraj Houston, Advocate Sr.8456 +1cc to the Government Pleader Sr.9020 W.P. No.2012 of 2022 kg[co] srg 01/03/2022