Senguttuvan v. State Rep By

T.V.THAMILSELVI,J.

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the alleged offences punishable under Section Man missing altered to Sections 147, 148, 120(B), 450, 302, 201 of I.P.C in Crime No.511 of 2022, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused kidnapped the deceased on the instructions of the wife of the deceased and murdered him. Hence the complaint. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that only based on the confessions statement made by the co-accused the petitioner has been implicated in this case. He further submits that he was present at the scene of occurrence, that apart he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Hence prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the

petitioner.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit the petitioner along with other accused kidnapped the deceased and murdered him. Hence he vehemently opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of offence committed by the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 31.01.2023 smn

T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.

smn 31.01.2023