B.Dharuman v. State Of Tamilnadu

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 24.06.2022 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR.MUNISHWAR NATH BHANDARI, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE N.MALA W.P.No.17626 of 2008

1. B.Dharuman

2. M.Belli

3. K.Kamalakkannan ..

Petitioner Vs.

1. State of Tamil Nadu rep. by its Secretary to Government School Education Department Secretariat, Chennai 9.

2. Joint Director of School Education (Higher Secondary) Chennai 6.

3. P.Natarajan

4. I.Rose Vanaja Selvi

5. K.Ilamparthi

6. I.Jagannathan

7. A.Kathirvelu

8. R.Gunasekaran

9. N.Saroja 10.K.Deventhiran 11.K.Balasubramanian 12.T.P.Dakshinamoorthy 13.T.K.Palanichamy 14.J.Chandraleka 15.K.Selvaraj 16.S.Mayakrishnan 17.S.Manivelu 18.N.Arunachalam 19.V.Swamyprasad 20.J.Pazhanisekar 21.K.Ramanujam 22.K.Jagadeesa Chandrabose 23.K.Mohan ..

Respondents

Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records pertaining to the order passed by the first respondent in G.O.Ms.No.266, School Education Department, dated 18.10.2000 and the consequential panel drawn for promotion to the post of P.G. Assistant (Economics) for the year 2008 by the second respondent in his Proceedings No. Nil dated Nil and quash the same and direct the respondents to draw the panel from among the persons who possess both Basic Degree and Master Degree in the same subject and consequently give promotion to the petitioners as P.G. Assistant (Economics).

For the Petitioners : No appearance For the Respondents : Mr.P.Muthukumar State Government Pleader Assisted by Mr.K.M.D.Muhilan Government Adovcate for Respondent-1

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) None appears for the petitioners in the writ petition preferred in the year 2008 challenging the panel drawn by the respondents 1 and 2 for promotion.

2. The writ petition was not argued either by the petitioners or by their counsel at any point of time, after its institution. None is present even today. It seems that the petitioners are not interested to pursue the writ petition.

3. In view of the above, the writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There will be no order as to costs. Consequently, M.P.No.2 of 2008 is also dismisse.d Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar kpl

To:

1. The Secretary to Government School Education Department Secretariat, Chennai 9.

2. Joint Director of School Education (Higher Secondary) Chennai 6.

+1 cc to Government Pleader Sr.NO. 39823 W.P.No.17626 of 2008 sr ii(CO) A.SK(06/07/2022)