← Library
Madras High CourtWP/17814/2008closed

D. Sampath v. The Tahsildar

2018-11-12Honourable Mr Justice R. Mahadevan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 12.11.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.No.17814 of 2008 D.Sampath ...

Petitioner Vs 1.The Tahsildar, Vandavasi Taluk, Vandavasi, Thiruvannamalai District.

2.Jeenandramalai 3.Arugadass 4.Padma Priya 5.Prithivirajan 6.Sudharsan 7.Sekar 8.Chandra Kumar (R2 to R8 impleaded as per the order of this Court dated 04.09.2008 in MP.No.2 of 2008) ... Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent to hold an enquiry regarding the change of patta in respect of the lands situated in Piruthur Village of Vandavasi Taluk comprised in S.Nos.333/12, 333/13 and 335/1 and submit the report to the District Revenue Officer and communicate the same to the petitioner in terms of the petitioner's representation dated 13.06.2008.

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Subramani For R1 : Mr.J.Ramesh, AGP For R2 to R8 : M/s.Sai Bharath & Ilan

ORDER

The prayer made in this writ petition is to direct the respondent to hold an enquiry with regard to the change of patta in respect of the lands situated in Piruthur Village of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Vandavasi Taluk comprised in S.Nos.333/12, 333/13 and 335/1 and submit a report to the District Revenue Officer and communicate the same to the petitioner, based on the petitioner's representation dated 13.06.2008.

2.Today, when the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the first respondent, on instructions, submitted that during the pendency of this writ petition, enquiry was conducted and appropriate order was passed on the petitioner's representation and hence, nothing survives for adjudication in this writ petition.

3.The said submission made by the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the first respondent has been fairly conceded by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel for the respondents 2 to 8. 4.Recording the same, this writ petition stands closed. However, it is open to the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum in the manner known to law, if he is still aggrieved. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True copy// Sub Assistant Registrar rk To The Tahsildar, Vandavasi Taluk, Vandavasi, Thiruvannamalai District.

+1cc to Mr.SAI Bharath, Advocate SR.No.77159 +1cc to Mr.V.Subramani, Advocate SR.No.76970 +1cc to Government Pleader SR.No.78044,77706 W.P.No.17814 of 2008 EV(CO) GMY(08/05/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/