R.Viswanathan v. The Superintending Engineer/

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 02-01-2019 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.33524 of 2006 R.Viswanathan ... Petitioner Vs The Superintending Engineer/Metro, Coimbatore Electricity Distribution Circle, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Tatabad, Coimbatore-12.

... Respondent Prayer:- Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the entire records connected with the impugned order passed by the respondent in Memo.No.12360/Adm.III(1)/2006-2 dated 19.8.2006 and quash the same with the consequential direction, directing the respondent to disburse the entire amount of General Provident Fund to the petitioner with interest.

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Ravikkumar For Respondents : No Appearance

O R D E R

The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the writ petitioner submits that the prayer sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to the said effect.

2. In view of the submission and the endorsement made by the learned counsel for the writ petitioner, this writ https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, there shall be no order as to costs.

Svn Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. The Superintending Engineer/Metro, Coimbatore Electricity Distribution Circle, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Tatabad, Coimbatore-12.

W.P.No.33524 of 2006 KAN(CO) KAK(24/01/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/