M.Shanmguanathan v. The District Collector

W.M.P.No.3170 of 2025 W.M.P.No.3170 of 2025 in W.P.No.2876 of 2025 M.SUNDAR.J., and K.RAJASEKAR, J., (Order of the Court was made by K.RAJASEKAR., J.,) This order will now dispose of the captioned 'Writ Miscellaneous Petition' [hereinafter 'WMP' for the sake of brevity].

2. Captioned 'Writ Miscellaneous Petition' ['WMP' for the sake of brevity] has been filed with a prayer to dispense with production of 'original notice No.Na.Ka.No.B1/1852/2024 dated 13.01.2025 issued by R3' [hereinafter 'impugned order' for the sake of brevity, convenience and clarity].

3. Mr.M.Gnanasekar, learned counsel on record for writ petitioners is before this Court.

4. Learned counsel for writ petitioners submits that the original impugned order is not readily available with writ petitioners at the time https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/2

W.M.P.No.3170 of 2025 M.SUNDAR.J., and K.RAJASEKAR, J., of filing of captioned writ petition but photo copies of the impugned order is filed along with the typed set of papers and that has necessitated the captioned WMP.

5. Taking into account the fact that the authenticity of the impugned order is not subjected to contestation or disputation, as a one off case, we are considering the dispense with prayer making it clear that in the days to come, adequate articulation in the support affidavits is imperative.

6. In the light of the narrative thus far, dispense with prayer is acceded to. Captioned WMPs are ordered as prayed for. [M.S.J.,] [K.R.S.J.,] 29.01.2025 gpa (3/3) W.M.P.No.3170 of 2025 in W.P.No.2876 of 2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/2