S.Boopathy v. The Tahsildar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 21.02.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P. No.15070 of 2009 S.Boopathy .. Petitioner -vsThe Tahsildar, Mettur Division, Salem District.

.. Respondent Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of a Writ of mandamus to direct the respondent to disburse the pension and other pensionary benefits to the petitioner with 18% interest. For Petitioner ::

Mr.S.Ilamvaludhi For Respondent ::

Mr.K.Ravikumar, Additional Government Pleader

ORDER

The writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the respondent to disburse the pension and other pensionary benefits to the petitioner with 18% interest.

2.When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent, placing on record, a letter addressed by the respondent on 20.02.2019, submitted that the prayer in the writ petition has become infructuous since the proposal for the pensionary benefits has been sent to Accountant General by the then Tahsildar on 17.05.2011 and the pension has been sanctioned to the petitioner on 30.06.2011.

3.In view of the submission made by the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent, the prayer in the writ petition has become infructuous as nothing further survives for adjudication. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

s/d- Assistant Registrar(CS VI) True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

vga To The Tahsildar, Mettur Division, Salem District.

+1 CC to Govt. Pleader sr 16662.

W.P. No.15070 of 2009 SP(01/04/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/