Ravi v. The State Rep By, The Inspector Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 23.01.2026

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR CRL OP NO. 1507 of 2026 1.Ravi 2.Tamilselvi

...Petitioners/A1&A2

Versus

The State rep. by The Inspector of Police Perumbalai Police Station Dharmapuri District Crime No.7 of 2026.

Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest pending investigation in Cr.No. 7 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police.

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Sakkarapandi For Respondent : Ms.J.R. Archana Government Advocate (Criminal Side) ----

O R D E R

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 118(1), 351(3) of BNS in Crime No. 7 of 2026, on the file of the respondent Police, seeks anticipatory bail.

1/6

2.The allegation against the petitioner is that there was a civil dispute between the petitioners and the de-facto complainant, and on 10.01.2026 at about 7.00 hours, the de-facto complainant and his wife were in their field, the petitioners using filthy language and assaulted the de-facto complainant with woodenlog and stones, resulting in, the de-facto complainant severely injured and later, he rushed to the hospital. Hence the complaint has been registered.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offences as alleged by the prosecution and this case is a counter case in Crime No. 8 of 2026 has been registered against the de-facto complainant and they are ready to cooperate with the investigation, and therefore, the custodial interrogation of the petitioners is not necessary. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal side) for the respondent police, reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the injured is discharged from the hospital. He further submitted that this case is a counter case in Crime No. 8 of 2026 registered against the de-facto 2/6

complainant. He further submitted that the petitioner is not having any previous case. He opposed granting anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

5. Heard the learned counsels and perused the materials available on record.

6. Considering the nature of the allegations, and the petitioners are not having any previous case; that there is a counter case in Crime No. 8 of 2026; that the injured is discharged from the hospital, I am of the view that the custodial interrogation of the petitioners is not necessary to investigate the case of this nature, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

7. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the learned District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Pennagaram, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

3/6

(a) If the petitioners fail to surrender before the concerned Magistrate, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, this order shall stand automatically cancelled;

[b] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity;

[c] the petitioners shall report before the respondent Police daily at 10.30 a.m for a period of three weeks and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation;

[d] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of 4/6

Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283];

[e] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S. 23.01.2026 MSM To 1.The District Munsif Cum Judicial Magistrate, Pennagaram. 2.The Inspector of Police Perumbalai Police Station Dharmapuri District Crime No.7 of 2026.

3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

5/6

K.RAJASEKAR , J.

MSM Crl.O.P.No. 1507 of 2026 23.01.2026 6/6