Vasuki v. The State Rep By
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 03.02.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI CRL.O.P.No.2556 of 2022 Vasuki
...Petitioner
Versus
The State represented by
...Respondent
The Inspector of Police, D5 Marina Police, Chennai.
(Crime No.663 of 2021) Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of her apprehending arrest pending investigation in Crime No.663 of 2021 on the file of the Inspector of Police, D5 Marina Police, Chennai.
For Petitioner :
Mr.P.Thinesh For Respondent :
Mr.N.S.Suganthan, Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
ORDER
The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 8(c), 20(b) (ii)(B) of NDPS Act in Crime No.663 of 2021, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that thee accused arrested by the respondent police and recovered one kg and 300 grams kanja based on their confession statement she was arrived as fourth accused on the file of the respondent police. Hence this complaint.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and she has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that she is ready to co-operate for investigation. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent submitted that 4 previous cases pending against the petitioner like nature, investigation almost completed. However, he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.
6. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on her appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days after lifting of lockdown or the commencement of the Court's normal functioning whichever is earlier, before the learned II Metropolitan Magistrate, Egmore, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that: [a] the petitioner is directed to deposit a sum of Rs.
10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) to the credit of the Tamil Nadu Registered Advocate Clerk Association, Chennai within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order and shall produce the said receipt before the Court below. [b] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity.
[c] the petitioner is directed to report before the respondent police on every Wednesday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders;
[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.
[e] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions
have been imposed and the petitioner released on anticipatory bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].
[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC. -sd/- 03/02/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.
TO 1 THE METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, NO.II, EGMORE, CHENNAI.
2 THE CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE, EGMORE, CHENNAI. [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.
4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, D-5, MARINA POLICE, CHENNAI.
5 THE REGISTERED ADVOCATE CLERK ASSOCIATION, HIGH COURT, CHENNAI.
CC to M/S.P.THINESH Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.2556/2022 Date :03/02/2022 TA-14/02/2022