Shriram Chits Tamil Nadu v. Sercry To The Govt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 22.10.2018
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE R.SURESH KUMAR W.P.Nos.6661 to 6663 of 2003 W.P.No.6661 of 2003 Shriram Chits Tamil Nadu (P) Limited, Formerly known as Shriram Chits Tamil Nadu Limited, 21, Madurai Road, Trichy - 8.
...... Petitioner Vs.
Chennai - 28.
4. Lizy Lilly Mary
5. Thomas Alwa Edison
6. N.V.Srinivasan
7. S.Marimuthu Prayer in W.P.No.6661 of 2003 :
Writ Petition filed under Respondent in G.O.(D) No.212 of Commercial Taxes (G) Department, dated 15.07.2002 and quash the same, confirming the order of the II Respondent, dated 24.04.2000 made in ARC No.112/97. W.P.No.6662 of 2003 Shriram Chits Tamil Nadu (P) Limited, Formerly known as Shriram Chits Tamil Nadu Limited, rep by Chief Executive 21, Madurai Road, Trichy - 8.
...... Petitioner
Vs.
Chennai - 28.
4. Lizy Lilly Mary
5. Thomas Alwa Edison
6. N.V.Srinivasan Prayer in W.P.No.6662 of 2003 :
Writ Petition filed under Respondent in G.O.(D) No.7 of Commercial Taxes (G) Department, dated 08.01.2003 and quash the same, confirming the order of the II Respondent, dated 24.04.2000 made in ARC No.123/97. W.P.No.6663 of 2003 Shriram Chits Tamil Nadu (P) Limited, Formerly known as Shriram Chits Tamil Nadu Limited, rep by Chief Executive 21, Madurai Road, Trichy - 8.
...... Petitioner Vs.
Chennai - 28.
4. Lizy Lilly Mary
5. N.V.Srinivasan
6. I.Khupudeen
7. S.Marimuthu Prayer in W.P.No.6663 of 2003 : Writ Petition filed under Respondent in G.O.(D) No.260 of Commercial Taxes (G) Department, dated 16.08.2002 and quash the same, confirming the order of the II Respondent, dated 24.04.2000 made in ARC No.115/97. For Petitioner : Mr.K.V.Ananthakrushnan in all the writ petitions For Respondents : Mr.P.P.Purushothaman, Govt. Advocate for R1 to R3 Mr.V.Raja Mohan for R4 Mr.R.Govindaraj for R5 to R7 COMMON ORDER The prayer sought for in these writ petitions are as follows :
W.P.No.6661 of 2003 has been filed seeking for a writ of certiorarified mandamus, to call for the records relating to the proceedings made by Secretary to Government, the First Respondent in G.O.(D) No.212 of Commercial Taxes (G) Department, dated 15.07.2002 and quash the same, confirming the order of the II Respondent, dated 24.04.2000 made in ARC No.112/97. W.P.No.6662 of 2003 has been filed seeking for a writ of certiorarified mandamus, to call for the records relating to the proceedings made by Secretary to Government, the First Respondent in G.O.(D) No.7 of Commercial Taxes (G) Department, dated 08.01.2003 and quash the same, confirming the order of the II Respondent, dated 24.04.2000 made in ARC No.123/97. W.P.No.6663 of 2003 has been filed seeking for a writ of certiorarified mandamus, to call for the records relating to the proceedings made by Secretary to Government, the First Respondent in G.O.(D) No.260 of Commercial Taxes (G) Department, dated 16.08.2002 and quash the same, confirming the order of the II Respondent, dated 24.04.2000 made in ARC No.115/97.
2. Heard Mr.K.V.Ananthakrushnan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Mr.V.Raja Mohan, learned counsel appearing for the fourth respondent and Mr.R.Govindaraj, learned counsel appearing for R5 to R7 and Mr.P.P.Purushothaman, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for R1 to R3 in all these writ petitions.
3. When these batch of three writ petitions came up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for either side had made
submissions that, since the matter has already been referred to Mediation and Conciliation Centre for settlement, where conciliation went on successfully, with the result on 12.10.2018, settlement was reached between the parties, especially between the fourth respondent and the writ petitioner in all these three writ petitions.
4. According to the settlement, the fourth respondent has paid a sum of Rs.50,000/- for the chit amount due to the petitioner for all the three chit transactions, which triggered three orders passed by the first respondent, against which three writ petitions were filed.
5. Since the said settlement reached between the parties, i.e., the petitioner and the fourth respondent, the same has been reduced into writing by way of compromise memo. The said compromise memo reached between the parties in all the three cases, dated 12.10.2018 are taken on record and the said compromise memo shall form part of the record in all these cases.
6. In view of the settlement reached between the parties, by which the issue has been completely settled between the petitioner and the contesting fourth respondent as full and final settlement, there is no further issue for adjudication in these cases.
Therefore by taking on record, the compromise memo, dated 12.10.2018 entered into between the petitioner and the fourth respondent separately in all the three cases, all these writ petitions are dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to costs.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IX) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar tsvn To
Chennai - 28.
+3cc to M/s.N.Mohideen Basha, Advocate sr.no.71781 to 71783 +1cc to Government Pleader sr.no.72448 W.P.Nos.6661 to 6663 of 2003 nr 31/10/2018