C. Venkatachalam v. The State Election

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 05.12.2018

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.36712 of 2006 and M.P.No.2 of 2006 C.Venkatachalam ..Petitioner vs 1.The State Election Commission, rep.by its Secretary, Chennai - 600 026.

2.The District Collector, District Election Officer, Coimbatore District, Coimbatore.

3.The Commissioner, Pongalur Panchayat Union, Pongalur, Tiruppur Taluk, Coimbatore District.

.. Respondents Prayer:

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the first respondent relating to his order in S.O.73/2003 TNSEC/ E-1 as published in the Tamil Nadu Gazette, quash the same in so far as it relates to the petitioner.

For Petitioner :Mr.K.Muthukumarasamy For Respondents :M/s.R.Janaki, Additional Government Pleader for R1 & R2 Mr.V.R.Thangavel for R3

O R D E R

The learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayer in the writ petition has already became infructuous and he had also made an endorsement to that effect. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. Recording the same, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar kak To 1.The Secretary, State Election Commission, Chennai - 600 026.

2.The District Collector, District Election Officer, Coimbatore District, Coimbatore.

3.The Commissioner, Pongalur Panchayat Union, Pongalur, Tiruppur Taluk, Coimbatore District.

+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.84433 W.P.No.36712 of 2006 RSV(CO) rrs 02/01/2019 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/