← Library
Madras High CourtWP/3283/2026disposed of

E.Ravi v. The Collector Of Tiruvannamalai District

2026-02-04Honourable Mr Justice Abdul Quddhose5 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 04.02.2026 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE 1.E.Ravi 2.E.Anand ... Petitioners Vs.

1.The Collector of Tiruvannamalai District, Collectorate, Tiruvannamalai.

2.The District Revenue Officer, Tiruvannamalai.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tiruvannamalai.

4.The Tahsildar, Arni Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District.

... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent herein to reclassify the petitioners lands measuring 50 cents in Block 2, Ward C, comprised in T.S.No.29/2B as Ryot-Punjai in Arni Town and Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District and issue patta in the name of the petitioners for the above lands as per the judgment and decree dated 06.03.2006 made in O.S.No.42 of 2004 on the file of the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Arni, Tiruvannamalai District, as on 24.10.2025 by letter Na.Ka.A2/2946.

Page No.1 of 5

For Petitioners : Mr.R.Agilesh for M/s.T.Dhanasekaran For Respondents : Mr.D.Ravichander Special Government Pleader *****

ORDER

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking to direct the 1st respondent to re-classify the lands morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition as Ryot Punjai lands instead of Sarkar Poromboke road.

2. Mr.D.Ravichander, learned Special Government Pleader, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

3. The petitioners claim that erroenously, the subject lands have been now classified as Sarkar Poromboke road. The petitioners seek for re-classification of the lands as Ryot Punjai. They have given a representation on 03.11.2025 to the respondents. Even prior to the said representation, proceedings have been initiated by the respondents on the petitioners' request seeking for re-classification of the lands. The same is also confirmed by the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

Page No.2 of 5

4. No prejudice would be caused to the respondents, if the petitioners' representation as stated supra is considered on merits and in accordance with law, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

5. This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioners' representation.

6. For the foregoing reasons, this Court directs the 1st respondent to pass final orders on merits and in accordance with on the petitioners' representation, dated 03.11.2025 seeking for re-classification of the lands morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition as Ryot Punjai instead of Sarkar Poromboke road, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

7. With the aforesaid directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

Index : Yes / No (2/2) Speaking order / Non-speaking order Page No.3 of 5

ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

To 1.The Collector of Tiruvannamalai District, Collectorate, Tiruvannamalai.

2.The District Revenue Officer, Tiruvannamalai.

3.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tiruvannamalai.

4.The Tahsildar, Arni Taluk, Tiruvannamalai District.

(2/2) Page No.4 of 5

W.M.P.No.3722 of 2026 in ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J.

Ordered on payment of separate court fee.

(1⁄2) Page No.5 of 5