← Library
Madras High CourtWP/16727/2013closed

S.E.Syed Gulam Mohideen v. Tamilnadu Wakf Board

2020-09-11Honourable Mrs Justice Pushpa Sathyanarayana2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 11.09.2020

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA W.P.No.16727 of 2013 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2013 S.E.Syed Gulam Mohideen ... Petitioner -vs1. Tamil Nadu wakf Board, Rep by its Chief Executive Officer, No.2, Seethakathi Nagar, Chennai -1.

2. The Superintendent of wakf Board, Jumma Pallivasal, Tanjore 613 001.

3. Syed Musthafa Basha

...Respondents

Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records of the 1st respondent herein pertaining to order bearing Na. Ka. No.4921/05/B7/Nagai dt 30.5.2013 and quash the same For Petitioner : Ms.Aishwaryanathan for M/s.Srinath Sridevan For RR1 & 2 : Mr.Haja Mohideen Gisthi Special Government Pleader For R3 : Mr.Jaffar

ORDER

This Writ Petition is heard through Video-Conferencing, on account of the COVID-19 pandemic situation.

2. The writ petition is filed challenging the order passed by the Chief Executive Officer of the Tamil Nadu Wakf Board, Chennai, dated 30.05.2013.

3.

The said communication mentions that Hazarad Syed Rahmathullah Sahib Wakf is a registered Wakf and the said Wakf https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

has been managed by Janab Syed Murthasa Basha in the capacity of a Muthavalli. The Urus festival was to be conducted between 11.06.2013 and 23.06.2013 and the Chief Executive Officer had requested the Superintendent of Police, Nagapattinam to give police protection for the smooth running of the said festival. The said communication is being challenged by the petitioner and now that the period of Sandalwood festival itself is over, there is nothing survives in this Writ Petition for adjudication, as the same has become infructuous.

4. It is also stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the right of the petitioner as a Muthavalli of Wakf Board is separately challenged in another W.O.P. No.9 of 2010. It is open to the parties, to establish their rights in the said petition.

5. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

No Costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. The Chief Executive Officer, Tamil Nadu wakf Board, No.2, Seethakathi Nagar, Chennai -1.

2. The Superintendent of wakf Board, Jumma Pallivasal, Tanjore 613 001.

+1cc to Mr.Srinath Sridevan, Advocate, Sr.No.29926 W.P.No.16727 of 2013 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2013 ajs(co) rr ii (29/09/2020) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/