Palanisamy v. The District Revenue Officer

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 07.01.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.No.16885 of 2009 and M.P.No.1 of 2009 Palanisamy ...

Petitioner Vs 1.The District Revenue Officer, Ariyalur District, Ariyalur.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ariyalur.

3.The Tahsildar, Ariyalur Taluk & District.

4.Thiru.Nagarajan ...

Respondents Prayer:

Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorari, calling for the records pertaining to the orders of the first respondent in Na.Ka.No.A2/10399/08, dated 15.07.2009, modifying the orders of the second respondent in Mu.Mu.No.5658/2006 (A5) dated 18.12.2006 and quash the same.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Kamadevan For Respondents : Mr.J.Ramesh Additional Government Pleader for R1 to R3 Mr.N.Manoharan for R4

ORDER

When this writ petition was taken up, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that on the basis of the civil proceedings relating to the issue involved in this writ petition, a compromise has been arrived at between the parties and hence nothing survives in this writ petition for any further adjudication.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. Recording the above, this writ petition is closed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.

s/d- Assistant Registrar True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar KM/ARB To

1. The District Revenue Officer, Ariyalur District, Ariyalur.

2. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Ariyalur.

3. The Tahsildar, Ariyalur Taluk & District.

W.P.No.16885 of 2009 and M.P.No.1 of 2009 SSV(CO) SP(08/02/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/