P. Baskar v. Dean
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED :06.11.2019
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.18921 of 2011
1. P.Baskar
2. R.Kumaran
3. K.Anandhan
4. M.Kaly
5. M.Munisamy
6. B.Muthukumaran
7. P.Boopalan
8. S.Vadivelane
9. P.Venkatesan 10.N.Kumaran 11.A.Hattavula 12.P.Jeeja 13.P.Muniswamy 14.S.Seetharaman 15.M.Palanivel 16.M.Anbalagan 17.D.Siva Balan 18.V.Paguialatchoumy 19.R.Ganapathy 20.B.Vanaja 21.ANAnbu 22.M.Mangalakshmi 23.D.Guitha 24.A.Raymond Ramehs 25.D.Selvakumar 26.C.Lakshmi Kandan 27.M.Sathish 28.A.Arivazhagan 29.Chandramathi 30.S.Solomon 31.A.Abdul Jabar 32.S.Vinayagam 33.L.Vadivel 34.M.Andajalatchy 35.S.Vengatesh Kumar 36.N.Tamilselvan 37.H.Shanthi 38.A.Prakash 39.M.Tandayoudabany 40.V.Gnanasekaran 41.K.Madhan
42.V.Gunasekaran 43.K.Radhakrishnan 44.S.Narayanan 45.N.Natarajan 46.B.Balasubramanian 47.V.Jayakumar 48.A.Sathiyamoorthy 49.L.Nithyanandham 50.P.Gopalakannan 51.B.Vijayakandiban 52.C.Sellammal 53.R.Purushothaman 54.P.Boobalan 55.M.Dayalan 56.R.Rajarathinam 57.M.Ramesh 58.R.Muruga 59.E.Meenakshi 60.R.Minatchy 61.R.Shanmugam 62.S.Djody 63.S.ArunRaj 64.A.Alil Rahaman 65.D.Surya Kumar 66.V.Parthiban 67.G.Vijayakumar 68.V.Vizea 69.P.Manicam 70.R.Vanitha 71.D.Sedhu Subramanian 72.S.Rathinam 73.A.Ramesh 74.G.Purushothaman 75.S.Suresh 76.S.Sendil Kumaran 77.M.Suresh 78.S.Chitra 79.R.Prabavathy 80.V.Aroumougame 81.S.Anandou 82.K.Balamurali 83.R.Damodaran 84.S.Mugurthen 85.J.Bhuvaneswari 86.J.Muthukumaran 87.S.Vizearagavane 88.R.Dhanalakshmi 89.D.Muthukumaran 90.B.Xavier 91.S.Rouccoumany
92.P.Malathy 93.R.Chitra 94.R.Geetha 95.B.Saleem 96.R.Rajesh 97.T.Palanisamy 98.S.Kothai 99.R.Idayavani 100.S.Bhuvaneswari
...Petitioners
..Vs..
1.The Dean Rajiv Gandhi College of Veterinary and Animal Science, Puducherry.
2.Secretary to Govt. for Animal Hasbandry and Animal Welfare, Chief Secretariat, Puducherry.
...Respondents
Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the first respondent with No.A12014/03/200910/A2/RAGACOVAS/VOL-II dated 17.06.2011 and to quash the same and consequently to direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioners against the vacancies in which the petitioners have been appointed with all other consequential benefits including arrears of wages, seniority etc.
For Petitioners : Mr.V.Ajaya Kumar For Respondents : Mr.Stalin Abhimanya (for first respondent) Mr.A.V.Ramalingam, AGP (for second respondent)
ORDER
During the pendency of the writ petition, all the petitioners were reinstated into service. The seven petitioners who have not registered their names in the Employment Exchange were not reinstated. In respect of the other petitioners, who are all found eligible, they were reinstated in service and they are now working. The relief sought for in the present writ petition is to reinstate the petitioners against the vacancies in which the petitioners have been appointed.
2.This being the submission made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent, the cause arouse in the filing of the writ petition did not exist as of now and accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of as infructuous. No costs.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar mrm To 1.The Dean Rajiv Gandhi College of Veterinary and Animal Science, Puducherry.
2.Secretary to Govt. for Animal Hasbandry and Animal Welfare, Chief Secretariat, Puducherry.
+1cc to Mr.A.V.Ramalingam , Advocate SR.No. 92633 +1cc to Public Prosecutor, pondicherry. SR.No. 92692 W.P.Nos.18921 of 2011 A.SK(12/12/2019)