Madras High CourtWP/3750/2007dismissed for nonprosecution

L. Thomas Sonof A. Lurdusamy v. The Chairman

2020-12-07Honourable Mr Justice P. Velmurugan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 07.12.2020 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.VELMURUGAN W.P.No.3750 of 2007 1.L.Thomas 2.S.Michael 3.E.Thangasamy 4.K.Senthur Pandi 5.R.Kalaiselvam 6.N.Rajaselvam 7.G.Vinod 8.C.Muthumalai ..Petitioners Vs.

1. The Chairman Madras Port Trust Madras.

2. The Evergreen Suppliers Having its Office at No.9, C.N.K.Road Chepauk Madras - 5.

3.S.Ramachandran 4.K.Ganesan 5.V.Jagadeesan 6.K.Kumarasamy 7.S.Arunachalam 8.M.G.Thennarasu 9.S.Arun Kumar ..Respondents [Respondents 3 to 9 impleaded as per order dated 30.3.2011 in MP.No.2/2008 in W.P.No.3750 of 2007] PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records on the file of the first respondent in proceedings No.A9/97/2006/CHD dated 05.12.2006 and further direct the first respondent to absorb the petitioners into the services on and from the date of representation dated 14.08.2001 together with all consequential benefits. For Petitioners : Mr.V.Raghavachari [No appearance] https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

For Respondents : Mr.V.Srikanth [R1 & R2] R & R4 - No Appearance

O R D E R

Consistently, there is no representation for the petitioner. When the writ petition was listed for hearing on 04.10.2020, there was no representation for the petitioner, hence, the matter was adjourned to 11.11.2020. On 11.11.2020 also, none appeared for the petitioner, hence, the Registry was directed to list the matter "for dismissal" on 27.11.2020. Thereafter, the matter came up before this Court on 03.12.2020, on which date, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought adjournment and the case was adjourned to 07.12.2020, under the caption "for dismissal." Though the matter has been listed today under the caption "for dismissal", the learned counsel for the petitioner is not present and hence, this Court has no other option, except to dismiss the Writ Petition for non-prosecution. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ds To:

The Chairman Madras Port Trust Madras.

W.P.No.3750 of 2007 pp(CO) rv(27/01/2021) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/