Rathinamma v. The District Collector

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 03.10.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P. No.17106 of 2012 Rathinamma .. Petitioner -vs1.The District Collector, Krishnagiri.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Krishnagiri.

3.The Tahsildar, Krishnagiri.

.. Respondents Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issue of a Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents to cancel the sub division in Survey No.8/2 of Dasegavanapalli Village, Krishnagiri Taluk and District. For Petitioner ::

No appearance For Respondents::

Mr.V.Shanmuga Sundar, Special Government Pleader

ORDER

When the matter was taken up for hearing on 30.09.2019, there was no representation for the petitioner and therefore, the same was directed to be listed today under the caption 'for dismissal'. Even today there is no representation for the petitioner and the same shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. Therefore, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed and the same is dismissed. No costs. vga Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To 1.The District Collector, Krishnagiri.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Krishnagiri.

3.The Tahsildar, Krishnagiri.

W.P. No.17106 of 2012 Kak(19/11/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/